Evidence Library

Author-written abstract

We introduce QULT-C (Quantum Unified Loop-Time Cosmology) — a layered computational ontology for quantum cosmology comprising three formal contributions. (1) The COSI Stack: a seven-layer formal architecture that partitions physical processes by computational function, from the Planck-scale quantum substrate (Layer 1) through wavefunction evolution, entropy flow, spacetime geometry, rendering control, and causal routing, to cyclic cosmological transition (Layer 7), extending Penrose’s conformal cyclic cosmology with formal computational architecture. (2) The Planck-Native Metric System (PNMS): a complete unit system derived from fundamental constants (ℏ, c, G, kB ) spanning all physical dimensions, in which the Plameter, Plasecond, WarpTick, Quasiplanck, and Ricci-Bit provide natural scales for all QULT-C quantities. (3) COMAF-Lite: a declarative domain-specific language (DSL) for writing and executing QULT-C physical models, formally specified by a complete EBNF grammar and JSON Schema, transpilable to Wolfram Language and Python, and demonstrated through five Wolfram Cloud-verified simulation test cases covering bounce cosmology, decoherence-limited expansion, entropy-curvature feedback oscillation, black hole collapse, and black hole entropy pixel count.

Five physical constant naturalization analyses — re-expressing tp , Λ, α, mH , and SBH in PNMS units — demonstrate the framework’s interpretive coherence. Quantitative consistency checks yield: decoherence coupling bound αD < 3 × 10−9 from BEC coherence-time data, spontaneous collapse rate Γ ∼ 10−16 s−1 per nucleon (within a factor of 5 of the GRW rate), a cos2 θ angular decoherence signature distinguishing QULT-C from isotropic quantum Brownian motion, a 1/r4 effective force correction from the WKB semiclassical limit, and a well-posedness proof for the linear regime (β = 0) of the QULT-C Schrödinger equation. QULT-C is proposed as an interpretive framework, not a proven physical theory. No claim constitutes proof that physical reality is computational. All novel claims are explicitly classified as reframings (RF), novel interpretations (NI), formal contributions (FC), or speculative proposals (SP).

The ascii rendering of Friedrich Dürrenmatt at the opening of this paper serves as a symbolic threshold. It recalls the tension, central to Die Physiker, between knowledge, responsibility, and the institutions that claim the authority to judge both. In that spirit, this work does not ask for lowered standards, only for consistent ones: that what is novel be examined with the same methodological seriousness with which what is familiar is defended. A proposal should stand or fall by its clarity, rigor, and testability, not by whether it arrives in an expected form.

Full text (PDF) — 1.337lulz, abstract on page 3.