Pillar · AI governance · EU AI Act · GDPR · HIPAA · Ethical AI

AI Governance, done operationally.

The advisory approach connects AI risk assessment, technical documentation, human oversight and operational controls. Applicable duties depend on the system, organizational role and jurisdiction; this is not a guarantee of compliance. Enterprise infrastructure and cybersecurity form the foundation of the advisory work. See the career background for the scope of previous roles.

Four layers of AI governance

Regulatory compliance

EU AI Act risk classification, GDPR alignment for AI pipelines, HIPAA handling patterns for regulated industries, sector-specific documentation readiness.

Risk controls & audit trail

Three-Lines-of-Defence mapped to AI-specific risks. Post-market monitoring, human oversight, logging, incident reporting as working artifacts, not intentions.

Ethical alignment

R.E.A.D. × TV is an author-published research proposal for ethical-alignment measures. Its version 1.4 paper describes the proposed method; it does not establish independently validated ethical measurement or regulatory certification.

Operational integration

Governance layered into delivery: engineering gates, release reviews, model cards, and reviewable agentic workflows that don't turn into black boxes when audited.

Where the governance work lives

This pillar page is the index. Each link below is the concrete surface: regional advisory, framework definition, canonical paper, or applied case.

EU AI Act Consultant (DE + AT) Dedicated advisory surface for EU AI Act risk classification, compliance readiness, and governance frameworks. AI Governance Consultant DACH DACH-wide governance advisory for Germany, Austria, Switzerland with multi-country operating-model fit. R.E.A.D. × TV Framework (glossary) R.E.A.D. × TV is an author-published research proposal for ethical-alignment measures. Its version 1.4 paper describes the proposed method; it does not establish independently validated ethical measurement or regulatory certification. R.E.A.D. × TV Framework paper R.E.A.D. × TV is an author-published research proposal for ethical-alignment measures. Its version 1.4 paper describes the proposed method; it does not establish independently validated ethical measurement or regulatory certification. Medical Imaging AI Research The paper explores transfer learning for medical imaging and capsule endoscopy. Read the research and its assumptions before applying the findings. Research is not evidence of clinical deployment, regulatory approval or a clinical-performance improvement. No such outcome is claimed here. KI Governance Beratung (DE) Deutsche Schwester-Seite: die Governance-Beratung für den DACH-Raum mit EU-AI-Act-Fokus.

FAQ

What does AI governance cover on this site?

The advisory approach connects AI risk assessment, technical documentation, human oversight and operational controls. Applicable duties depend on the system, organizational role and jurisdiction; this is not a guarantee of compliance.

How does the EU AI Act work in practice?

Check prohibited practices under Article 5, the high-risk criteria and exceptions under Article 6 and the annexes, and relevant transparency duties under Article 50. Intended purpose and the operator’s role matter; a four-label summary does not replace that assessment.

What is the R.E.A.D. × TV Framework in this context?

R.E.A.D. × TV is an author-published research proposal for ethical-alignment measures. Its version 1.4 paper describes the proposed method; it does not establish independently validated ethical measurement or regulatory certification.

Does it establish clinical deployment or approval?

The paper explores transfer learning for medical imaging and capsule endoscopy. Read the research and its assumptions before applying the findings. Research is not evidence of clinical deployment, regulatory approval or a clinical-performance improvement. No such outcome is claimed here.

What regions does this work cover?

Based in Cologne, Germany. Available for engagements in Vienna and across DACH.

Bring your AI governance to life

The advisory approach connects AI risk assessment, technical documentation, human oversight and operational controls. Applicable duties depend on the system, organizational role and jurisdiction; this is not a guarantee of compliance.

Open a conversation